A must watch must watch, this woman Tiffany Cianci went through the ringer with private equity firms, these groups trap you in DNAâs and Arbitration clauses so you via contract must get screwed in secret courtrooms and can not tell anyone, the only reason she was freed from her NDA was she won a libel suit, this is a fast spreading cancer killing America
Knowledge is power, learn and share
Okay so I watched that, ai elieve it is happening in many places, I dont think our emergency rooms are ran by private companies yet. But anything is possible I suppose. Stinking crooks âŠ
FYI : lot of ripoffs in medical world . Cost me 3,058 dollars to get 4 stitches 2 yrs ago.
Have you not been to the ER?
Do you get a single bill from the hospital?
And you doubt the story?
I can go on and on, familiar with âreal world assetsâ crypto?
Blackrock, Blackstone âŠ
Perhaps its time for you to watch this
In almost every one of those click accept things if a person takes the time to read. Most people I educate just shrug shoulders and ask âwhat do you do?â⊠they donât really want the answer.
FIFY
A lot of movement, growth, consolidation and power among private equity firms, corporations, etc. I have no problem with individuals and corporate/business interests becoming wealthy and profitable. Heck, the wealthier and more priofitable the better, especially if theyâre American businesses. But I donât like it when itâs at my expense or at the expense of the American public. Capitalism is good, and I strongly believe in it, but I think un-checked capitalism can be a real detriment and bad not only for the economy but for our country as a whole. The examples posted above tend to show that.
I think efforts will continue in the legislature and executive to move towards more free and unchecked capitalistic imbalances, which unfortunately will likely be at our expense. One thing that I donât believe will move forward is the strengthening of both our 1st and 2nd (and 4th Amendment) rights. NDAâs, SLAPP suits, etc., are proliferating. Republicans and âconservativesâ pay lip service to their base by claiming they support 2nd Amendment rights, but nothing happens. As an example, when the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress during the 1st Trump Administration, they had the votes and politcal ability to pass the National Reciprocity Act and the Hearing Protection Act. Neither bill was advanced for a vote. I believe that was on purpose.
âConservativesâ seem to only want to conserve the wealthyâs status quo. Strengthening the 2nd Amendment, and thereby arming more of the American citizenry, including the vast population of the working poor, is a huge threat to those in economic and political power, especially as the wealth and income gap continues to grow to historical levels. The French Revolution, Leninâs Bolsheviks, and other events throughout history of the poor masses overthrowing the ruling wealthy elite come to mind.
Hence, my skepticism that the Republicans will pass the National Reciprocity Act and Hearing Protection Act (or any bill that strengthens any of our civil rights) now that they again control both houses in Trumpâs 2nd term. Theyâll use the excuse that itâs not a priority right now. Theyâll claim legislation to improve the economy takes precedence. Okay, but what might that be? What economic bills are they advancing to help those of is in the middle class?
Meanwhile, theyâll waste time debating and trying to pass anti-transgender bills or some such nonsense like that. I have nothing against transgenders or the LGBTQ community. Itâs a free country and they can live their own life however they want. In fact, I donât think Iâve ever seen more than a handful of people that look transgender in my lifetime. To me, none of that is a priority. And while 2nd Amendment causes may not be as much a priority as national security or immigration or the economy, theyâre still very important to me, as are 1st and 4th Amendment rights and democratic values and ideals. But I doubt none of the 2nd Amendment bills will come up for a vote because they likely donât align with measures designed to protect the wealthy corporate interests. And if private equity firms can swoop in and do their thing (at the expense of the working poor and middle class), then protecting and defending that likely takes more priority than legislation to strengthen and protect our civil rights.
Anyway, just my humble opinion.
Great long reply, did you watch the video?
I ask as surely profit is not bad, problem here is weâre not speaking of profit, its outright rape of the system or less dramatic simply
You did great to bring up
As weâre well on our way to not only a repeat but an exasperated one, I think the seven year tribulation described in Daniel talks about the first half having more wealth and prosperity than has even been seen before with the second halve having more horror than has ever happened before.
Crypto alone can make the former possible, but add in as you term
with the means described in the video and its a given, the state of our national debt backs it up as well, especially with the speed at which it occurred.
So yes, the red/white terror and French revolution are excellent points to bring up 
When it becomes a monoploy its then bad .
Good points. I have nothing against making as much profit as possible as long as itâs not at my expense or at the expense of the American public. And just to be clear, Iâm certainly not advocating any violent uprising of the masses or anything like the French Revolution. I prefer to avoid all that by implementing measures (enforcement of antitrust laws, passage of tax reform laws, strengthening workers rights, health care reform, immigration reform, etc.) to save our country and our American democratic ideals.
But I think itâs telling that no 2A bills were advanced for a vote during the 1st Trump Administration (despite a theoretically easy win). Will this new Republican Congress advance and bring to a vote the National Reciprocity Act and Hearing Protection Act? Iâm skeptical it will.
As another example, the Trump Administration has already rescinded Biden-era environmental regulations that wouldâve further restricted pollution from coal-fired power plants. But where is the rescission on Bidenâs ATF rule on 80% lowers? Or why hasnât the Republican controlled Congress introduced legislation on that to resolve the issue once and for all?
And what about civil forfeiture laws that are a clear violation of 4th Amendment due process laws? I could go on, but legislative bills, including bills strengthening our 2A rights to help us law-abiding common folk, seem to have been forgotten or viewed as unnecessary.
Trump grew up in the Empire State, he does not know guns, he is not a champion for gun rights.
Worse yet, he is to connected to Israel, I strongly recommend everyone watch
It should then become clear how much of a mistake Trump is making with Israel.
Israel had Oct 7th, it is on par with our 9/11 and is all deep state related for one purposeful intent that does not include our owning guns.
But, what new thing is under the sun, do we know the absolute truth of November 5 (1605) or was it another false flag deep state operation?
The reason the JFK files are not being released in full should be obvious.
It was not a foreign operation.
Well, seems that wasnât bad enough
Itâs hard for me to understand what the British Commonwealth is about.
It gives me strong WEF vibes. Nonbinding, soft power, all about reputation and influence.
Unless Trump has some plan to exert influence on them in some way, I donât see what advantage we get by submitting to their value judgments.
Donât be fooled, the King is Head of State for a number of countries, Head of the Common Wealth, all legislation passed by UK Parliament must receive his sign-off to become law, in CA Governor General Mary Simon is the personal representative of King Charles, and has the ultimate constitutional power in Canada.
All that without getting into deep state operations, power does not surrender itself, it cloaks itself, infowars (today) covered a CBC story which clearly printed King Charles forced Trudeuâs resignation, infowars also reported the King has the power to cause a redo for any election ad nauseam until satisfied with the results.
Iâll bet you donât see that for NATO or the UN either, right?
And the US is one of five permanent founding members of the UNâs security council.
If you desire our national sovereignty and are not globally minded then youâll not see an advantage for us, itâs not even a good joke.
The monarch also gives royal assent to bills passed by Parliament, meaning that all legislation must receive his sign-off to become law. He or she plays a similar part in appointing new prime ministers and Cabinet members.
The governmental position of the British monarch is very confusing. On one hand, he is the head of state. On the other hand, he has very little statutory power.
When combined with the policy of monarchs never publicly expressing political opinions, it looks as if the point is to give plausible deniability to the monarch and hide what he really does. This way, the subjects can theoretically be united under him, since he never expresses anything controversial.
I am not aware of the British monarch having any authority to command member nations in his role as Head of the Commonwealth. Then again, this might be another stratagem to obscure his actions.
âŠin other words, the King controls who is in charge.
How many levels do you think that needs to be done on to control everything?
More than even one, or would even just one do it?
Whats the operative word there?
Daniel 7 speaks on the beasts as kings
Despite some setbacks
there are two promises
But for who, really?
The King does that via the legal fiction of the Crown in his role as King of the United Kingdom and of the various nations subject to the Crown, i.e. the 15 Commonwealth realms. This is not to be confused with the 56 Commonwealth Nations. In theory, the Crown has no authority over the 56 Commonwealth countries as such, but only over the 15 Commonwealth realms (an informal term), a subset of the Commonwealth Nations which are monarchies subject to the Crown.
For example, although India is a Commonwealth country, it is not a monarchy but a republic, and they recognize the monarch as a symbol and figurehead, rather than in any constitutional or legal function of government. On the other hand, Canada is a monarchy and a member of the Commonwealth realms, and the Crown appoints their governor general, prime minister, etc.
In relation to the 56 Commonwealth countries, it appears that the monarch is basically hereditary leader of the âEnglish culture fan club.â And again, how much influence he has in that role is unclear.
Two things stick out to me in your reply
and
The theory is a King who is in control of who can be a prime minister
has those prime ministers create a sub group
and has unclear influence?
Câmon, itâs as clear or unclear as a person is willing to see.
Same with Netanyahuâs control over Israel, the BIBI files is a couple of hours of interviews that can not be clearer as to what type of person he is, nor can how utterly destroyed the Gaza Strip is in compared to outside of its borders in what weâre to believe is a war?
IDK what Trumps actual intent is befriending both, but it looks like two wolves and a sheep discussing our fate.
All three leaders are aged, as is the Pope, no doubt soon weâll see them all replaced, the likelihood with a single leader who promises to fix the world so long as we all submit as a single commonwealth no matter what name is chosen, and what room will there be for us gun owners?
Maybe Trumpâs goal is to exploit the âfree tradeâ Harare principle to eliminate tariffs on US exports, and then threaten to leave the âclubâ if it tries to assert control over America.
Regarding Israel, America has ideological bases for the alliance. One, America is a nation of Bible believers. Americans believe that G.d gave the Holy Land to the Jews, as written throughout Scripture. To revolt against that and hand the Land over to enemies of both America and the Jews would be a huge blow to Americaâs sense of justice, faith and morale. Two, Israel is fighting against Jihadists who gleefully violate all norms of Western warfare, hate anybody who is not a Muslim, and seek to take over the world. That also speaks to Americaâs sense of justice, faith and morale.
Further, America gains military advantages from allying with Israel. Israelâs activities in preventing a nuclear Iran are well-known. The Israelis are also probably the worldâs leading experts in counter-terror operations and urban warfare, especially since this is the daily reality that all Israelis have had to live with, military or not. The Israeli Air Force has earned international respect for tactical and technical innovations like those of the undefeated F-15I dual-role fighter-interceptor, and they routinely participate in joint exercises with their US counterparts. Israel has also served as a testing ground to help refine US interceptor missile and other technologies as part of their famed Iron Dome system, of which multiple batteries were built in the US. And of course the Mossad has a reputation as one of the most capable intelligence agencies in the world.
No matter his goal at no point should we be in any club with the King as head, even if so claimed as figurative, its BS, I personally donât think a president should play games with peoples lives when that game previously meant people loosing their lives.
And Iâll leave the Israel discussion alone until you can watch the BIBI files and defend his actions, as they are not defendable then we might be able to have a similar or level discussion on what Israel is with him in charge, which would be like discussing the US with Biden in charge.
There is no part of that documentary and the testimony including his that ends with him not being a criminal, the US pulling a sanctions card with respect to the ICC attempting to intervene is not something an ally does, its something an accomplice does, its not a
In many cases Israel seems to have created their enemies no different than how the Reichstag fire did, Israel excels at war no doubt, I donât believe Jews do though, do they?
Rhetorical no need to answer, there are many different types of Jews, as there are Muslims, I donât think the âStateâ of Israel equals what God promised, but God can still use it, though as it appears it will be used for, not against WWIII, Trump is practically holding a dead mans trigger for it too by declaring:
Between the King of clubs and that we seriously have two buckets
good thing I didnât discuss further huh? 
Seriously, watch the BIBI files.
Iâm not sure which game you mean, but I agree, Iâd much rather we not join the club in the first place. At the same time, I understand that politics is a dirty business, and that doing the unexpected, as Trump has done on this battlefield, can yield advantages or at least a strategic delay. If there is no concrete and immediate risk I can identify, Iâm willing to give him a chance, like I did with the Soleimani assassination and am doing now with his tariffs and 2A policies.
Speaking of dirty politics, the Bibi Files has some signs that it is more motivated by politics than by ethics. For example, the director gave interviews about it to Democracy Now and JStreet (a pro-Palestinian activist group). He also chose to premiere the film in Canada, which recently said it would enforce the unprecedented ICC kangaroo court arrest warrant against the Israeli PM for âwar crimesâ. The film presumes that the audience, like the producers, oppose the war in Gaza, calling it a âforever war,â without suggesting a practical alternative. (I never considered the two-state solution with a terrorist entity practical, and 10/7 is just further evidence that Hamas would not allow a stable peace.)
If you know anything about Israeli politics, you would know that there has been a very powerful authoritarian, secularist, leftist faction. That is the voicing and target audience of the Bibi Files. In some ways, this faction is comparable to the left in the US.
For as long as I can remember, Bibi has been a polarizing political figure, much like Trump. Those who hate him believe he is the archon of evil, and a corrupt and slippery politician. I would suggest that, considering those with whom Israel must negotiate, and the many political parties who must join together to form a coalition government, diplomatic sophistication is a critical requirement for the prime ministry. Netanyahu certainly has that sophistication. Nevertheless, with decades of high-stakes close elections and wins and losses, and the usual personal accusations that go along with this turmoil, corruption accusations have been constant.
Up until 10/7, the leftwing faction had enough influence to prevent Israel from taking decisive defensive action against Hamas, but after the massacres, Israeli public opinion shifted to the right. That is what allowed the war in Gaza to happen.
The latest slime campaign against Netanyahu has been an investigation into whether he was bribed by Qatar. He rebuts this, asserting that given the timing, this was clearly a maneuver to prevent him from dismissing Shin-Bet director Ronen Bar. Netanyahu had ordered Bar to report on intelligence failures leading to 10/7 and granted him several deadline extensions to do so, before finally making the decision to fire him for failing to deliver the report. On the due date, and day of Barâs firing, the Attorney General announced the aforementioned investigation into Netanyahu. It should be noted that the High Court which stayed Netanyahuâs order is itself accused of a leftwing anti-religious bias, and was the subject of a push for judicial reform until 10/7 put the reform campaign on hiatus.