No ruling yet, but justices seem poised to rule in favor of the ATF rule on 80% lowers.
Thats a bunch of Bull canât give the ATF an inch or they will take a mile.
Well, weâll have to wait until their ruling, but most of the time you can gauge how theyâll rule based on how the oral arguments go. Itâs surprising to me, though, after the Supreme Court struck down the Chevron deference in their recent Loper Bright decision, and they also struck down the ATFâs rule on bump stocks.
Yes, if they do not have Chevron Deference then the rule on 80% lower should be null and void .
Wasnât there recently a ruling where you can remove serials numbers without it being a crime?
Uh , yeah right along with the withdrawal of funds from armored trucks. âŚlol okay
P.S. this movie is based on a True Story is is So funny you will have break a rib laughingđ
alright lets roll
Which seems contrary to the articles argument
These kits appear to exist to evade two federal laws, one of which requires guns to have serial numbers that can be used to track them if they are used in a crime,
The argument as I see it is still commercial vs private, they may well rule on 80% âkitsâ we need to watch the launguage closely.
Bwahahaha, @Belt-Fed can be the get away driver
Good find, Robert. I hadnât heard of that case before. It appears to be from a lower district court, though. I googled it and found the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower courtâs decision.
That was a bad case to appeal for 2A supporters. The defendant was a felon in possession of a firearm. It wouldâve been a more sympathetic case if it wouldâve been a little old lady with no priors or someone like that.