Supreme Court May Rule For Background Check for 80% Lowers

No ruling yet, but justices seem poised to rule in favor of the ATF rule on 80% lowers.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-supreme-court-appears-to-have-found-a-gun-regulation-it-actually-likes/ar-AA1rUtxH?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=fcc1b563e27949458ab4576c835bb213&ei=15

3 Likes

Thats a bunch of Bull :poop: can’t give the ATF an inch or they will take a mile.

3 Likes

Well, we’ll have to wait until their ruling, but most of the time you can gauge how they’ll rule based on how the oral arguments go. It’s surprising to me, though, after the Supreme Court struck down the Chevron deference in their recent Loper Bright decision, and they also struck down the ATF’s rule on bump stocks.

4 Likes

Yes, if they do not have Chevron Deference then the rule on 80% lower should be null and void .

3 Likes

Wasn’t there recently a ruling where you can remove serials numbers without it being a crime?

3 Likes

Uh , yeah right along with the withdrawal of funds from armored trucks. …lol okay
P.S. this movie is based on a True Story is is So funny you will have break a rib laughing😂

4 Likes

alright lets roll

Which seems contrary to the articles argument

These kits appear to exist to evade two federal laws, one of which requires guns to have serial numbers that can be used to track them if they are used in a crime,

The argument as I see it is still commercial vs private, they may well rule on 80% “kits” we need to watch the launguage closely.

3 Likes

Bwahahaha, @Belt-Fed can be the get away driver

4 Likes

Good find, Robert. I hadn’t heard of that case before. It appears to be from a lower district court, though. I googled it and found the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s decision.

That was a bad case to appeal for 2A supporters. The defendant was a felon in possession of a firearm. It would’ve been a more sympathetic case if it would’ve been a little old lady with no priors or someone like that.

2 Likes