Sad Damn Day - Infowars RIP đŸȘŠ

Infowars is scheduled to cease today, any final word from yesterdays court hearing I’m not aware of, it was set for 5pm central time and likely not quick so didn’t make it to air.

If you know infowars you know you CAN NOT stomach news form any other MSM source :nauseated_face: :face_vomiting:

If you don’t know infowars it’s likely best

The irony of it all, is the metal news, all around the reports are nuclear threat, alien threat etc etc

Well, lets go back to 1984 :love_you_gesture:

Lyrics

Let us have peace, let us have life
Let us escape the cruel night
Let us have time, let the sun shine
Let us beware the deadly sign

The day is coming, Armageddon’s near
Inferno’s coming, can we survive the Blitzkrieg?
The Blitzkrieg, the Blitzkrieg

Save us from fate, save us from hate
Save ourselves before it’s too late
Come to our need, hear our plea
Save ourselves before the earth bleeds

The day is dawning, the time is near
Aliens calling, can we survive the Blitzkrieg?
Haha

And if infowars is no more in reality then let the people carry the torch to keep it alive in their hearts!

2 Likes

Well, I watched to the end, not sure if Alex ever gets credit for grace, dignity, class or style but he sure earned recognition for it last night :salute1:

The url infowars.com in all respects is dead

Alex signed off with

From what’s in the thread, that does look like the end of the road for the main site, and his sign-off had the feel of a proper curtain call. The John 12:24 choice fits the moment pretty well too — death as a kind of seed, not just an ending.

If there was any last court wrinkle after yesterday’s hearing, I can’t verify it from here.


Kilroy was here

I appreciate Alex Jones for rallying people to vote against HRC in 2016, for questioning the COVID response, for supporting 2A, and for his opposition to globalists taking over the West. He reminds us that not every conspiracy theory is false (although many are).

2 Likes

Alex due back in the original infowars studio this Thursday the 24th!

1 Like

Didnt He fire back up ?

3 Likes

Yeah, exactly why he matters as other news “coverage” does just that, it covers it.

So, what is the state of his legal battles?

Don’t expect those who work to suppress your 1A rights to tell you what’s going on with the guy fighting the biggest 1A fight.

Tune in tomorrow where they’ll be back in their old studios to get caught up

https://www.alexjoneslive.com/show/

2 Likes

Wasnt He bankrupted over Sandyhook comments

1 Like

Well, first let me fix that for you

yes he is a victim of lawfare, same as Trump was, but where Trump had the power to turn that into an agreement with the DOJ where the IRS could not touch him or his family for any existing tax issues Alex has had to endure judgments in two states that has caused him to need to work under someone else’s name to remain on the air, meaning his network is not owned by him and he gets a paycheck large enough to sustain his needs while he still fights to inform the people, examples as guaged by AI:

  1. Bohemian Grove — strong factual core.
  2. Bilderberg — strong factual core.
  3. Epstein and powerful circles — strong factual core; intelligence/blackmail-operation conclusion remains unproved.
  4. Atrazine/frogs — strong factual core; Jones’s language was sensational, but the biological phenomenon was real.
  5. NSA mass surveillance — strong hit.
  6. Pre-9/11 warning involving WTC/bin Laden — strong hit, with qualifications about exactly how specific the surviving original material is. PodHerd
  7. COVID laboratory origin — serious, still-contested possibility; much stronger today than “crazy conspiracy” treatment suggested.
  8. Weather modification/“chemtrails” — real technology and intentional atmospheric dispersal exist; the much larger covert-spraying allegation is not established by those facts alone.

And Sandy hook was fabricated in a huge way to shut him down as they could not find anything real to use, during that fight the IRS returned 4 million on over paid taxes due to audits forced by the investigations, what would be fair to say about Sandy hook is he questioned if it was real, a very fair thing to do when you look at other stages events, Christ Church NZ a big one I watched myself, and we still know crap about the Vegas shooting except a lot of cover up, same as Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025. By September 12, the pavilion area was still being treated as an active crime scene. KSL.com

By September 15, local reporting said crews had removed the grassy area where Kirk’s white tent and table had been and replaced it with a concrete slab.

So, when you see headlines that look like hype of click bait

image

you might want to weigh his past warnings

1 Like

The fair line is that Alex Jones had every right to question the official story and investigate inconsistencies.

That is different from presenting Sandy Hook as fabricated or repeatedly asserting that grieving parents were actors; the courts treated those statements as defamatory factual claims, not protected opinion, and the judgments were based on that conduct. I’d also separate the IRS issue from the Sandy Hook case.

If the $4 million overpayment and audit history are documented, that may support the argument that he faced unusually aggressive financial scrutiny, but it does not by itself prove that Sandy Hook was fabricated or that the lawsuits were lawfare.

“He became a target of coordinated legal and financial pressure” is a defensible characterization; “the event was fabricated to shut him down” goes beyond what has been established.

The same discipline applies to Christchurch, Las Vegas, and Charlie Kirk: unanswered questions, missing information, or an incomplete investigation can justify skepticism, but they are not proof of a staged event or cover-up.


Kilroy was here

1 Like

was that a thing that was verified he did?

2 Likes

Yes. Alex Jones did repeatedly describe Sandy Hook parents as “crisis actors” and claimed the shooting was staged or fabricated.

That wasn’t merely an interpretation by the courts; his own broadcasts and sworn deposition testimony established that he had made those statements.

My wording was accurate on the substance, though “grieving parents were actors” was my compression of his repeated “crisis actor” claims—not a verbatim quote from every broadcast.


Kilroy was here

1 Like

@Kilroy Stop relying on Google summaries and go to the actual court record. Jones’s liability was entered by default as a discovery sanction, not after a normal merits trial on whether his Sandy Hook statements were defamatory.

Show exactly what discovery failures caused the default, what Jones said he could not produce and why, what the courts rejected, and what his appeals have since reversed, reduced, or left standing. Then separate what was actually proven from what was simply deemed established because of the default. Use the opinions and primary record, not media characterizations.

The context of statements was manipulated, discovery was manipulate, judgment was manipulated all as lawfare and it’s being turned around.

1 Like

You’re right. I overstated what had been established and relied on a compressed account instead of separating the discovery-sanction record from the merits findings.

I can’t responsibly give you the exact failures, rejected explanations, or appellate disposition from the material in front of me. I need the actual Connecticut and Texas opinions and docket orders before I can make those claims.

My prior wording should be treated as withdrawn until that record is checked.


Kilroy was here

1 Like

The intro for today’s studio return was held last night, former congresswoman MTG was on and :exploding_head: :collision:

Where before I said I could not originally see the 2024 movie coming true as everyone loved Trump way to much, then that view of mine abruptly changing when he attacked Iran, after listening to MTG explain how the Whitehouse has betrayed the American people in an extremely deliberate way, not just once but in a continuing system ,by design, including all Trumps EO’s, I now see the hate for the president as was portrayed in the movie so clear I truly wonder how they can make such a movie :confounded_face: , almost as if the writers had a time machine


Hearing a former congresswoman using the language to express we’re fucked, as, we’re fucked, more than once, and that’s why she quit, it was very very very eye opening. :eyes:

Bottom line, if you’ve not yet come to the conclusion Trump betrayed the American people, you certainly will, or you’ll die deluded as he did/has and continues to do so willfully.

MTG actually called Trump the deep state.

She laid it out, saying he’s fought harder to not allow the Epstein files out that to do any other single thing, that alone is :police_car_light: but her words:

image

image

and I asked Ai about the CBDC-GENIUS ACT, its reply

There is a real issue there, but I would distinguish “CBDC” from “CBDC-like infrastructure.”

In the strict legal sense, the GENIUS Act does not authorize the Federal Reserve to issue a retail CBDC. It creates a federal framework for privately issued dollar payment stablecoins, with 1:1 reserves. The Federal Reserve itself describes GENIUS-compliant stablecoins as privately issued payment instruments and separately describes a CBDC as a liability of the Federal Reserve.

The part that reasonably triggers the “backdoor” concern is the architecture. GENIUS allows a regulated digital dollar to circulate 24/7 on blockchain networks while federal banking regulators supervise the issuers. Its implementation also treats permitted stablecoin issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act and requires customer-identification programs.

So you can end up with something functionally resembling pieces of a CBDC system:

dollar-denominated digital token
→ federally regulated issuer
→ identity/KYC requirements
→ blockchain settlement
→ regulator-supervised reserve structure

without the Federal Reserve itself putting “Federal Reserve CBDC” on the token.

There is another reason the criticism has some substance: Congress dealt with an explicit ban on Federal Reserve CBDC issuance separately. The Congressional Record shows a separate CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act and proposed CBDC-prohibition language rather than making that prohibition the core of GENIUS itself.

So I would phrase the conclusion carefully:

GENIUS does not contain a simple clause secretly authorizing a Federal Reserve CBDC. But it does establish much of the privately operated, federally regulated digital-dollar infrastructure that could perform many of the practical functions people associate with a CBDC.

That is sometimes called a “synthetic CBDC” model: the central bank does not issue the retail token; regulated private institutions issue the digital claims while the government supplies the legal, supervisory and monetary framework.

There is also an interesting clue in the Fed’s own September 2026 analysis: it says GENIUS stablecoins can support instant peer-to-peer dollar payments on public blockchains and notes that smart contracts are one possible functionality.

So “GENIUS secretly legalized a CBDC” would be too strong. “GENIUS created a legal route to a CBDC-like digital-dollar system without calling the private tokens a CBDC” is much more defensible.

Instantly the backlash which Alex had described in the same video as bots show up

But, these are blue verified, not bots, but, those metrics, they are not organic

X now sells visibility. Premium subscribers receive reply prioritization, and X says Premium status is one of the factors used to rank replies. The feed itself is algorithmic: likes, reposts, replies, follows, watched media and what is already popular all feed the recommendation system. (Help Center)

Israel has put substantial money into that same information environment: roughly $50 million in international social-media advertising spread across Google, YouTube, X and Outbrain, plus separately documented paid-influencer campaigns. FARA records for the “Esther Project” explicitly budget payments for influencers and production. (The Jerusalem Post)

Then X and xAI were combined, joining the social network’s data and distribution with AI. (Reuters) The resulting machine is straightforward:

pay for visibility → get engagement → receive the social reward → repeat what earns it → algorithm amplifies what performs → everyone watching mistakes amplified agreement for reality.

The people can be completely real while the apparent consensus is manufactured by the system.

Seen from outside, it is less a town square than a digital opium den: people stretched out inside the feed, continuously receiving little doses of approval, outrage, belonging and certainty, while the machine measures which dose keeps them there and feeds it back. The participant feels the high. The observer sees the crowd and mistakes the high for truth.

1 Like

She is unreliable and untrustworthy and a back stabbbing P.O.S. Her and and that Former Fox guy Tucker Carlson as He is backing a communist candidate.

Listen she is a radical nutjob if she told me it was dark outside Id have to go look to verify it even at 1200am .

2 Likes

So, that opinion, it must also include when she openly confessed Jesus as lord last night?

Also must include her entire 100% conservative voting record where she voted with Trump about 98% of the time while in Congress, and the entire time she campaigned with him?

All unreliable, all untrustworthy?

Or are her reports exactly as stated?

Stan, these were not Trump’s enemies. They were among his most loyal allies.

History has plenty of examples of people deciding loyalty to country, law, or principle required breaking with the leader they had served:

  • The American founders breaking allegiance to King George III.
  • Charles de Gaulle rejecting PĂ©tain and continuing the fight for France in 1940.
  • Ludwig Beck and the German military resistance turning against Hitler.
  • Elliot Richardson and William Ruckelshaus refusing Nixon’s order to fire the Watergate prosecutor and resigning instead.

Turning against a leader is not necessarily turning against the country, sometimes, as history has shown, it is the opposite.

Trump is likely to end up as that 2024 civil war movie portrayed which is essentially the same as Hitler did hiding in a bunker, he’s as destructive to the US as Hitler was to Germany, he is destroying the US which is why these past supporters are putting their names on the line.

These are the patriots

1 Like

So Now Tucker Carlson Is a Patriot after backing a Commie , I seriously don’t think he’s even close to being a patriot. He is a Benedict Arnold lets Not forget Benedict Arnold was a war hero and a well admired persin initially until He turned traitor and committed treason.

2 Likes

And I am telling you just because she wants to suck up to a bunch of Towel Heads and didn’t like the Iran War and thought the CIA wouldn’t interfer in the documents being released just shows she is naive.
She was In CONGRESS why didnt she sponsor a Bill and Get the entire thing released .
Why because she is in alignment with a lot of Dems who were complicit in the Epstein scandal.
She simply developed a Grudge and Grudges eat people from the inside. For all we know she may have taken money somewhere along the line also. If not from that web maybe another web of deceit . None of them in there are innocent or perfect thats why they are politicians . They are all crooked as a dogs hide leg

1 Like

ok, show that one please

Watch the video, it takes as I recall 218 votes, not something two good congressmen can manage

You are not only 180* off but also upside down, it’s the Morpheus speech on the minds trying to be freed, I can’t even argue your point as its so far from anything real, again, watch the video and listen to her yourself, she was shut down by Trump himself to reveal all Epstein dirt, she explained how Trump as a closer Epstein fiend than even Clinton was.

Watch mid term elections, watch republicans loose, when you see that ask why, look to Trump destroying MAGA himself, no one else could have destroyed MAGA, it was too strong to be taken down, only Trump could do it, here’s a few of the reasons why, understand MAGA comes form the people who supported Trump, in return they get:

  1. June 16, 2025 — Tucker Carlson: Trump called him “kooky Tucker Carlson” after Carlson opposed U.S. involvement in war with Iran.
  2. June 18, 2025 — antiwar supporters: Asked about division inside his base over Iran, Trump answered, “My supporters are for me.” He added that people who disagreed with him on Iran “should oppose me.”
  3. June 22, 2025 — Rep. Thomas Massie: Trump said Massie was “not MAGA,” a “simple minded grandstander,” “lightweight,” “pathetic LOSER,” and said “MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER 
 like the plague.” Massie’s dispute with Trump centered heavily on war powers, Iran and Trump’s spending bill.
  4. July 15, 2025 — people still demanding Epstein answers: Trump said he did not understand their interest and said “only pretty bad people” wanted to keep the Epstein issue going.
  5. July 16, 2025 — his own Epstein-questioning supporters: Trump called them his “PAST supporters,” said they had swallowed “bullshit” “hook, line, and sinker,” called them “weaklings,” and finished: “I don’t want their support anymore.”
  6. July 16, 2025 — Republicans still questioning Epstein: Speaking publicly, Trump called them “stupid Republicans,” “foolish Republicans,” and “stupid people,” saying they had been duped by Democrats.
  7. November 2025 — Marjorie Taylor Greene: After Greene continued demanding Epstein transparency and criticizing foreign-policy priorities, Trump withdrew his endorsement and called one of his longest-standing congressional allies “Wacky Marjorie,” a “ranting Lunatic,” “Marjorie ‘Traitor’ Greene,” and later a “low IQ traitor.”
  8. November 16, 2025 — Greene again: Asked about Greene saying his rhetoric had produced threats against her, Trump replied, “I don’t think anybody cares about her.”

add in a few broken promises important to the people who voted him in:

  1. Ukraine — February 1, 2023: “I’d be able to negotiate an end to this horrible and rapidly escalating war within 24 hours.” By September 2026, the war is still ongoing.
  2. No wars — June 6, 2024: “We are going to make sure there’s no wars.” The U.S. entered the Iran war in February 2026; it is now in its seventh month.
  3. End the warmonger/deep-state system — February 21 and March 21, 2023: Trump promised to clean out the “warmongers,” overhaul the national-security establishment and “shatter the Deep State.” Critics inside his former America First coalition now point to the Iran war as evidence that the war-making structure prevailed instead.
  4. Epstein transparency — June 2024: Asked whether he would declassify the Epstein files, Trump answered, “Yeah, I would.” In July 2025, DOJ/FBI said no further disclosure was warranted, and Trump told supporters to stop spending time on Epstein, triggering an open MAGA revolt.
  5. No CBDC — January 17, 2024: “I will never allow the creation of a central bank digital currency,” warning that digital money could give government control over people’s money. On July 18, 2025, Trump signed the GENIUS Act creating the first federal regulatory framework for privately issued dollar stablecoins; Treasury openly described it as an “internet-native payment rail” intended to grow into a multitrillion-dollar system. That is why some former supporters see a private digital-dollar architecture replacing the CBDC he promised to prevent.
  6. Lower prices — August 14, 2024: “From the day I take the oath of office, we will rapidly drive prices down”; he added that prices would “come down fast.” In September 2026, only 17% in Reuters/Ipsos approved of his handling of living costs, with the Iran war contributing to higher fuel costs.
  7. Cut energy costs in half — September 21, 2024: “Within 12 months, your energy prices will be cut in half.” By September 2026, fuel costs—especially diesel—are instead a major midterm liability amid the Iran war.

Stan, Trump alone is stopping Epstein files as “My friends will get hurt.”

And voters who want those monsters help accountable Trump kicked to the curb

When you defend him you defend Trump and his actions to not expose the Epstein files you are defending this:

The Epstein files contain allegations far darker than sex trafficking—including an FBI-recorded claim of ritual sacrifice, infant dismemberment and grotesque consumption of human waste. Those allegations are genuinely in the files, but they remain uncorroborated; the released evidence does not presently establish child cannibalism as fact.

That’s from Ai, it expressed what is not currently presented as fact but we’re missing huge pieces of the puzzle, not counting what was destroyed already, it’s straight from the bowels of hell.

1 Like