The intro for todayâs studio return was held last night, former congresswoman MTG was on and

Where before I said I could not originally see the 2024 movie coming true as everyone loved Trump way to much, then that view of mine abruptly changing when he attacked Iran, after listening to MTG explain how the Whitehouse has betrayed the American people in an extremely deliberate way, not just once but in a continuing system ,by design, including all Trumps EOâs, I now see the hate for the president as was portrayed in the movie so clear I truly wonder how they can make such a movie
, almost as if the writers had a time machineâŠ
Hearing a former congresswoman using the language to express weâre fucked, as, weâre fucked, more than once, and thatâs why she quit, it was very very very eye opening. 
Bottom line, if youâve not yet come to the conclusion Trump betrayed the American people, you certainly will, or youâll die deluded as he did/has and continues to do so willfully.
MTG actually called Trump the deep state.
She laid it out, saying heâs fought harder to not allow the Epstein files out that to do any other single thing, that alone is
but her words:


and I asked Ai about the CBDC-GENIUS ACT, its reply
There is a real issue there, but I would distinguish âCBDCâ from âCBDC-like infrastructure.â
In the strict legal sense, the GENIUS Act does not authorize the Federal Reserve to issue a retail CBDC. It creates a federal framework for privately issued dollar payment stablecoins, with 1:1 reserves. The Federal Reserve itself describes GENIUS-compliant stablecoins as privately issued payment instruments and separately describes a CBDC as a liability of the Federal Reserve.
The part that reasonably triggers the âbackdoorâ concern is the architecture. GENIUS allows a regulated digital dollar to circulate 24/7 on blockchain networks while federal banking regulators supervise the issuers. Its implementation also treats permitted stablecoin issuers as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act and requires customer-identification programs.
So you can end up with something functionally resembling pieces of a CBDC system:
dollar-denominated digital token
â federally regulated issuer
â identity/KYC requirements
â blockchain settlement
â regulator-supervised reserve structure
without the Federal Reserve itself putting âFederal Reserve CBDCâ on the token.
There is another reason the criticism has some substance: Congress dealt with an explicit ban on Federal Reserve CBDC issuance separately. The Congressional Record shows a separate CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act and proposed CBDC-prohibition language rather than making that prohibition the core of GENIUS itself.
So I would phrase the conclusion carefully:
GENIUS does not contain a simple clause secretly authorizing a Federal Reserve CBDC. But it does establish much of the privately operated, federally regulated digital-dollar infrastructure that could perform many of the practical functions people associate with a CBDC.
That is sometimes called a âsynthetic CBDCâ model: the central bank does not issue the retail token; regulated private institutions issue the digital claims while the government supplies the legal, supervisory and monetary framework.
There is also an interesting clue in the Fedâs own September 2026 analysis: it says GENIUS stablecoins can support instant peer-to-peer dollar payments on public blockchains and notes that smart contracts are one possible functionality.
So âGENIUS secretly legalized a CBDCâ would be too strong. âGENIUS created a legal route to a CBDC-like digital-dollar system without calling the private tokens a CBDCâ is much more defensible.
Instantly the backlash which Alex had described in the same video as bots show up
But, these are blue verified, not bots, but, those metrics, they are not organic
X now sells visibility. Premium subscribers receive reply prioritization, and X says Premium status is one of the factors used to rank replies. The feed itself is algorithmic: likes, reposts, replies, follows, watched media and what is already popular all feed the recommendation system. (Help Center)
Israel has put substantial money into that same information environment: roughly $50 million in international social-media advertising spread across Google, YouTube, X and Outbrain, plus separately documented paid-influencer campaigns. FARA records for the âEsther Projectâ explicitly budget payments for influencers and production. (The Jerusalem Post)
Then X and xAI were combined, joining the social networkâs data and distribution with AI. (Reuters) The resulting machine is straightforward:
pay for visibility â get engagement â receive the social reward â repeat what earns it â algorithm amplifies what performs â everyone watching mistakes amplified agreement for reality.
The people can be completely real while the apparent consensus is manufactured by the system.
Seen from outside, it is less a town square than a digital opium den: people stretched out inside the feed, continuously receiving little doses of approval, outrage, belonging and certainty, while the machine measures which dose keeps them there and feeds it back. The participant feels the high. The observer sees the crowd and mistakes the high for truth.