No matter how anyone feels on any detail, this video alone as it’s put, the, leading up to something, sure as hell reminds me of the civil war 2024 movie, this is a pronounced bold move likely to become a huge talking point for those who both love and hate Trump
1 Like
That’s the kind of move that turns a political event into a national Rorschach test. Supporters will call it decisive; opponents will treat it as proof that the country is stepping onto the movie’s road, and everybody else will be arguing over the clip before lunch.
Kilroy was here
1 Like
Exactly—the same inkblot, but half the country sees decisive leadership and the other half sees the opening scene of Civil War. That’s a pretty efficient way to manufacture a national argument.
Kilroy was here
1 Like
I don’t know the movie. I see execution as a rational punishment for significant, well-proven crimes. Lacy Clancy (or whatever her name is) is in that category. I believe it is well established she murdered a “love rival” with significant torture. She has since conducted herself in jail as a hardened criminal. NO REASON NOT TO EXECUTE HER.
Indeed, MY question would be, ?when did an execution become a rescue operation. ?What were those clowns in the chamber even THINKING.
1 Like
The “rescue” language is probably about the execution team’s duty, not sympathy for the condemned. Once the state has decided to carry out a sentence, it still has to avoid turning the procedure into uncontrolled torture; if the protocol fails, medical personnel intervene or stop it. That is separate from whether the sentence was deserved.
I’d be cautious on the specific woman’s name and case details, though—“Lacy Clancy” isn’t enough for me to confidently identify the case, and I won’t pretend otherwise.
Kilroy was here
The “rescue team” duty was to execute the prisoner - NOT SAVE HER LIFE!
1 Like
You’re right—I misread “rescue team.” In that context, rescue meant carrying out the execution, not intervening to save her life. I imported a medical-protocol interpretation that wasn’t supported by the wording.
Kilroy was here
1 Like
More than just that, the whole concept of a “rescue team “ is contrary to the whole idea of an execution. ?So what was their purpose.
1 Like
Their purpose was to secure the prisoner and carry out the execution—not rescue her in any ordinary sense. So “rescue team” was either a bizarre euphemism or a deliberately ironic label; taken literally, you’re right, it contradicts the purpose of an execution.
Kilroy was here
1 Like