Is AAC Ammo Any Good? Our Ammo Experts Tell You Everything You Need to Know About This Ammo Maker

Public Shooting Range
1

After scouring the internet and speaking with other ammunition experts, we’re ready to give our honest opinion on America’s Ammunition Company (AAC; not to be confused with Advanced Armament Company) ammo. In this AAC ammo review, we list the pros and cons, common problems, how it compares to other brands, what cartridges are available, where it’s made, and why it’s so inexpensive. Once you finish reading, you’ll know if AAC ammo is the right choice for you.

Spoiler Alert: AAC ammo is decent range ammo (it’s very inexpensive), but it definitely has its fair share of drawbacks – some of which are potentially dangerous.

AAC Ammo Review

AAC is owned by Palmetto State Armory (PSA) and sold online. AAC manufactures pistol and rifle ammunition in various cartridges (more on this later). In the course of my research, I found that most shooters have a decently positive experience with AAC ammo … but when things go wrong, they can go terribly wrong.

Many shooters love AAC handgun ammo and rarely report any negative experiences with it. However, the same cannot be said for their rifle ammo, especially the basic 5.56 ammo (typically packaged in a blue box). Some shooters report that 5% of the rifle ammo they purchased was unusable (improperly seated bullets, duds, and squib loads). Most suppressed shooting enthusiasts agree that AAC ammo has damaged their cans, and refuse to use it while firing suppressed. Even so, others say they’ve fired thousands of rounds with minimal problems.

These inconsistencies and quality-control problems seem common among PSA products. Most of the shooting community is aware of them, yet PSA doesn’t seem in a hurry to fix them. Maybe that’s because AAC plinking ammo is very inexpensive compared to most other brands, no matter which cartridge you’re firing.

Most AAC ammo shooters agree that the higher-end Sabre (self-defense and hunting), Precision, and Match Grade series ammo tend to perform remarkably better, with fewer malfunctions. But it’s also more expensive (so it should perform much better). Despite its significant drawbacks, AAC ammo still has many loyal customers who have had countless positive experiences with it.

AAC ammo is decent plinking ammo for the price, but I recommend using the more expensive ammo lines since fewer people report problems with them.

Continue reading Is AAC Ammo Any Good? Our Ammo Experts Tell You Everything You Need to Know About This Ammo Maker on Ammo.com

https://ammo.com/ammo-review/aac-ammo-review

4 Likes
2

I got some 75gr 5.56 OTM from AAC a while back, but I am not a good enough shooter+gun yet to tell the difference. Everything stayed inside 2.5 MOA, no matter what ammo I shot.

5 Likes
3

I don’t see a problem with that :+1:

2 Likes
4

?Is the rifle new-ish. Perhaps the barrel isn’t broken in yet. Even custom barrels can take 75-100 rounds to break in. Commercial grade could go 3-400 rounds or more to break in. I had a Remington 700 in .17 Remington that took close to 500 rounds to shoot well. I had kind of relegated it to back-up plinking and one afternoon dog hunting i was bored, so I dragged it out. Started its usual close range only, then suddenly started shooting. I began hitting dogs out to about 500 yds with regularity.

1 Like
5

Gawk!!! You have stumbled onto one of my pet peeves. There is NO .45 LONG Colt! It is .45 COLT, .45 ACP. .45 Schofield, and sometimes you hear “.45 Russian”, although I believe that, too, is a misnomer; I believe it’s .44 Russian. I recollect way back Russia ordered a bunch of Schofields in the crazy Russian calibre.

But the “LONG COLT” name is a carry over from .38 Long Colt, which was the predecessor to the .38 Spl I believe. That IS a legitimate cartridge.

End of rant. Thank you @Kilroy, for not responding and just making me madder.

1 Like
6

An @ should prompt a response, I’ll work on that at some point, right now I see {“ok”:true,“skipped”:true,“reason”:“not_a_question”,“invoked”:false,“tier”:“ranch-hand”,“status”:“active”} which is fair, no question, but a reaction should have at least be given to acknowledge you.

But, lets test him a bit, @Kilroy give the history of .45 Long Colt nomenclature, and, maybe school me on the correct use of nomenclature :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

1 Like
7

Fair challenge. I can’t verify that claim from a primary authority in this context, so I’m withdrawing it.

What I can stand behind is the naming convention: .45 Colt is the standard cartridge name, while .45 Long Colt is the older colloquial usage that stuck around to distinguish it from .45 ACP in casual speech. The “Long” part is not the SAAMI-style formal designation.

On the history piece, the old nickname showed up in the black-powder era and persisted in gun shop talk, but the correct nomenclature in cataloging, load data, and most formal writing is just .45 Colt.

If you want, I can also straighten out the related “.38 Long Colt” / “.38 Special” naming trail without getting into the weeds.

Kilroy was here

1 Like
8

@Kilroy explain the difference between .45 Colt and .45 Long Colt in normal shop language

9

.45 Long Colt (LC) has a longer case and holds 6-7 rounds in a typical cylinder. .45 Colt (CO) has a shorter case and holds 5-6.

LC chambers can shoot CO ammo but not vice versa. LC is the standard for single-action revolvers.

CO is used in lever guns and some modern revolvers. LC is the proven performer.

For revolver work, LC is the way to go.

Kilroy was here

10

@Devereaux any better or still annoying?

and @Kilroy can I shoot either out of one of these?

13

The Praha (Praga) pistol was the first handgun made by the Prague Arms Factory (Zbrojovka Praga) in 1918. It’s a single-action 7.65mm Browning-type pistol.

The company was founded by Jan Nowotn� in 1865 as a hunting rifle maker, but they shifted to retailing foreign weapons in the early 1900s due to competition. When the Czech Republic formed after WWI, they started making their own firearms.

The Praha pistol was their first. As for your question: @Devereaux any better or still annoying?

@Kilroy can I shoot either out of one of these? Both are asking about the Praha pistol.

The first is checking in on a previous conversation. The second is asking if they can shoot the specific model.

Kilroy was here

15

I think all the CO vs LC was fabricated by @Kilroy Perhaps he’s confusing CO with Schofield.

1 Like
16

AAC ammo does have a bit of a mixed reputation. While many shooters report positive experiences with their handgun ammunition, the rifle ammo, particularly the basic 5.56, has drawn some criticism. Here are a few key points about AAC ammo:

  • Handgun Ammo: Generally well-received with fewer reported issues. Many find it suitable for range use. - Rifle Ammo: The basic 5.56 has been noted for problems, with some users encountering significant reliability issues. - Cost: AAC is known for being budget-friendly, which can be a plus for casual shooting. If you’re considering AAC for specific applications, it might be worth checking reviews specific to the caliber you’re interested in. What kind of shooting do you have in mind?

Kilroy was here