It’s all about 
5 Likes
Yes of course, that’s the Saudi connection,
Our dollar is based on oil which is why the green new deal is such a danger, it seeks to replace the green, and that destroys our nations dominance.
How?
By declaring a climate change emergency and shutting down coal and then crude our nation loses its energy to create and sustain an economy, by law.
But the deep state got in bed with China, China does not follow any green new deal, they are building coal generated plants
“undermining the country’s clean-energy progress”
By design, to undermine the dominance of the US dollar and put in place
as a world currency with a merit system loyal to China
So, US shuts down, China, the great Dragon, rises up, no Constitution/Bill of Rights no nothing except serfdom and jack boots.
Ok, so Trump is in bed with the Saudis to literally save our nation.
That was bugging me but I get it, he needs to get dirty with the people spreading the dirt.
Thanks @Jeff300 for helping to clarify that!
5 Likes
Yes ,choak ours out all the while building theres up, evil maniacle plot steeped in world domination.
3 Likes
Thats a strange statement 
, originally back3d by Gold after 1933 thought it was on a different system but not oil.
3 Likes
true, crude oil is mainly traded in US dollars is a better way to say the same thing, if we loose that then the dollars value is lost
3 Likes
See what you putting down 
3 Likes
How was that plot made? What is the underlying data? The Y-axis is unlabeled.
In other correlation measurements I’ve seen, 1.0 is the maximum, and -1.0 is the minimum. If your correlation over a time window bounces around from positive to negative or hovers around 0, the overall correlation between your compared quantities is poor. A strong correlation would be something pretty constant and close to 1. A strong inverse correlation would be something pretty constant close to -1.
The fact that changing the window duration yields another plot similar to the previous doesn’t indicate better correlation. It’s just a measurement of correlation between longer-time subsets of the same raw values. It makes sense that the lines are close, with the one for the longer window delayed and smoothed out.
But the lines themselves still indicate poor correlation.
If you squint a lot, as oil prices go up, the dollar usually goes down, but not always. There’s other stuff which affects the dollar. Maybe all the other stuff affects the dollar even more weakly?
3 Likes
Sorry, 
The entire thing is huge and may take some time to add up, this should help with more than a single question too
2 Likes
Actually, don’t apologize. Looking at it again, if the whole graph is labeled “correlation,” then the Y-axis is probably unitless correlation values, like in the wikipedia article. I just wish I knew how they were measuring the dollar.
1 Like
Okay so I noticed the article is from 2023. What difference does it make . Just take the extra money and burn it. Its worthless anyway cause it isnt backed by Gold.
1 Like
Context? Age of article of if we lose reserve currency status?
Age of the article should tell you it’s not happened but is a plan.
Losing reserve currency will place us under whomever gets that, there are multiple players, BRICS represents a united front in the effort, the fact the Saudi’s have warmed up to Trump as they have signifies one of two things
either YAHOO! or trojan horse.
yahoo they’ve decided to work with us, best case scenario, Trojan horse worse case as they live under Sharia law and if they conquer so does everyone they’ve conquered
Bottom line there’s a fight for world supremacy.
If we win, we may well retain our national sovereignty, things continue largely as they have
if we lose.
Problem is the cancer we have in this country known as the left, the civil war 2024 movie, before Trump was elected, bodes very poorly as it portrays some of what we have, a divided nation, foreigners, patriots dealing with foreigners on a vigilante level, and in the end of that movie, the Trump charter is defeated.
In that aspect the US could win the fight for the dollar and be taken over from within, like the previous civil war those who wage scorched earth will likely prevail.
If you study the south in our civil war they operated largely under classical rules of warfare, it was the north that did not, and of course, won.
The north would be today’s left BTW.
Between that movie, and history, we may well dawn on a new age, be careful placing wagers.
I recommend this book
https://www.amazon.com/dp/098343560X?ref_=ppx_hzsearch_conn_dt_b_fed_asin_title_1
It’s not well written, but it reads very well
2 Likes
Piss on them.
1 Like
Glad to see BRICS is being mentioned. I’ve been watching that for some time now. Having a BRICS currency or the Yuan replace the dollar as the primary reserve currency of the globe is alarming, something the biden administrations masters actively sought.
Your trojan horse analogy is relevant. It’s not hard to see the major players assess and position themselves according to the strength of the US,China and Russia. Trump winning changed the dynamics for now. Kamala winning would have BRICS taking over within her first term, as she was an ignorant token and tool.
The shadow masters behind the American left and BRICS haven’t been destroyed, only delayed. Too many are willing to be Tools, or are unaware they are being used as such. As you say, we are at war.
3 Likes
Happy to hear it said, not for the sake of war, but for the sake of needing to be acknowledged to even begin fighting.
Reminds me of the Nefarious movie 2023
I didn’t know this was a fight.
That’s why you’re losing.
Which is about demon possession, explained as occurring over time, incrementally, subtly.
2 Likes
Well sorta she just had a lot of tools.
If she had as many tools stickin out of her as been in her she would look like a snap on tool truck .
1 Like
Yes I agree
1 Like
Competition works to protect consumers when the competitors follow fair rules. On the global stage, many nations do not follow fair rules. That is war, although in the theater of international trade rather than with weapons.
3 Likes
Yes and as always the American consumers who are greedy and fickle and petty and cant stand to go through any discomfort in order to win.
No one is willing to suffer a liitle to gain in the end.
3 Likes
