I’ve always been fascinated by the 243 ammo vs. 223 rem debate. Although they are similar in some aspects, the two rifle cartridges differ enough to be easily distinguishable and better suited for specific situations.
Let’s dive into those differences, see how they affect real-world performance, and help you decide which cartridge is better for you.
Differences Between 243 Win and 223 Rem
Subtle differences between these two cartridges affect their recoil, trajectory, stopping power, and many other important factorsLet’s examine the two rounds’ physical characteristics before contrasting their ballistic performance.
Cartridge Specifications
These rifle cartridges were developed around the same time and share multiple similarities to show for it. The .243 Winchester’s parent case is the .308 Winchester, whereas the .223 Remington’s parent case is the .222 Remington. Naturally, they have some drastic differences.
The 243 Win is larger in every way. Its bullet diameter (0.243”) is wider than the 223 Rem’s (0.224”). Its neck diameter (0.276”) is also 0.023” wider. The 243 has a wider base diameter (0.471”, as opposed to 0.376”). The 243’s case length is 2.045”, whereas the 223’s case length is 1.760”. As such, the 243’s overall length is 2.7098” – a giant compared to the 223 Rem at 2.260”. The 243’s case is also 68% more capacious: 52.8 grains H2O vs. 31.4 grains H2O.
The 223 Rem’s maximum pressure is 55,000 psi. At 60,000 psi, the 243 Win beats it out there as well.
Let’s see how the cartridges’ different specifications affect how they perform at the range and in the field.
Recoil: 243 Winchester vs. 223 Remington
I always compare recoil. It’s one of the first things a shooter asks: “How hard does it kick?” A cartridge with more recoil kicks the muzzle farther off the target with each shot, thus slowing follow-up shots. Strong recoil can also cause the shooter to flinch, which has further negative consequences for marksmanship.
The less recoil you feel, the more accurately you can fire. Less is always better for accuracy.
“Felt” recoil is subjective. It varies from shooter to shooter. That’s why I base my comparison on free recoil energy. It’s an objective measure of recoil determined by four variables: projectile weight, propellant weight, muzzle velocity, and firearm weight.
Knowing that these factors vary based on ammo selection, we can still anticipate the 243 Winchester having around 11 ft-lbs of free recoil energy (which isn’t much compared to its parent cartridge, the 308 Win). However, the 223 Rem has it beat with only 4 ft-lbs of free recoil energy.
The 223 Remington has less than half the recoil of the 243. Neither is known for being a shoulder thumper, but the smaller caliber round is the gentler one all the same.
Trajectory
A bullet’s trajectory is its path to the target. Although we often talk about “flat-shooting guns,” trajectory is rarely flat. A bullet’s trajectory frequently resembles an arch: rising, plateauing, and ultimately dropping.
When fired at targets within 100 yards, most rifle cartridges exhibit virtually zero bullet drop. As distance increases, bullet drop becomes more pronounced. This is because a bullet’s velocity steadily slows throughout its trajectory. A bullet necessarily requires more time to cover 100-200 yards than it does 0-100. As a result, gravity has more time to exert its influence on a bullet as it covers the farther span.
A 243 Winchester 90 grain bullet zeroed in at 200 yards has -6.1" drop at 300 yards; -18.0" drop at 400; -36.7" drop at 500.
A 223 Rem 55 grain bullet zeroed in at 200 yards has -7.3" drop at 300 yards; -22.8" drop at 400; -49.4” drop at 500.
Though close, the 243 Win has the flatter trajectory and wins this section.
Accuracy: 223 Rem vs. 243 Win
Accuracy is more often a function of the shooting platform and the shooter than of the cartridge itself. The ammo, the rifle, environmental conditions, and the shooter all bear heavily on how much accuracy a cartridge can exhibit.
For the sake of argument, we’ll only consider the cartridges’ trajectories and amount of recoil. This section is a tie since the 223 has less recoil, but the 243 has a flatter trajectory. Most shooters find it easy to fire accurately with either round.
Ballistic Coefficient
A bullet’s ballistic coefficient (BC) reflects how effectively it resists wind deflection and frontal air resistance. It’s a numeric representation of how aerodynamic a bullet is. A higher BC is preferable for long-distance shooting, as it indicates the bullet will exhibit a more predictable trajectory.
Sleeker bullets have higher BCs. So too do heavier bullets. The 243’s wider bullet may encounter more frontal air resistance, although its heavier weight and/or higher muzzle velocity give it greater momentum – the reason why it excels at shrugging off wind deflection. Taking this into account, it only makes sense that the 243 boasts a higher BC:0.343, as opposed to 0.252 for the 223.
The 243 Win wins this section.
Continue Reading 243 Winchester vs. 223 Remington: Is One Better Than the Other? on Ammo.com