The .44 Magnum is now well into its fifth decade and it seems good to look back at the history of this excellent, even all-around sixgun load and some of the fine guns that have been made and are still being made for the big forty-four.

If you are not a reader of Elmer Keith I would suggest that you become one. It is impossible to discuss the .44 Magnum without him. For much of his life Elmer was way ahead of his time. His books on sixguns, SIXGUN CARTRIDGES & LOADS (1936) and SIXGUNS (1955, 2nd Edition 1961) are still viable and still make good reading. His features and columns in AMERICAN RIFLEMAN in the 1920’s through the 1950’s, and GUNS and GUNS & AMMO from the 1950’S until the time of his stroke in 1981, still make fascinating reading. As Keith closed his book SIXGUNS in 1955, he said: "We desperately need a modern up-to-date, full-powered factory loaded .44 Special–the King of all Handgun Cartridges." Keith was right, but it would not be his .44 Special load but a totally new cartridge.

For thirty years Keith had been writing about his heavy handloads used in .44 Special sixguns, namely Smith & Wesson TripleLocks, and Model 1926 Targets, and in Colt Single Actions. His standard load was 18.5 grains of #2400 and his 250 grain Lyman #429421 bullet loaded over standard primers in balloon head cases. This load was changed to 17.0 grains of #2400 with the advent of modern solid head brass. Both loads give around 1200 feet per second from seven and one-half inch barreled sixguns.

For those same thirty years Keith had been trying to convince ammunition manufacturers to bring out his 250 grain/1200 feet per second .44 Special load but to no avail. Product liability is nothing new and they were afraid that someone would blow an old .44 Special apart. Elmer claimed there would be no problem with any Colt or S&W heavy frame sixgun, as he had been shooting this load in pre- World War II sixguns for years. It was my good fortune to inspect and unload many of Elmer’s sixguns after his death in 1984. I was able to lovingly fondle all the sixguns we had seen in pictures in magazine articles and books for so many years. None of the .44 Special TripleLocks, Model 1926’s, Model 1950’s, or Colt Single Actions showed any evidence of `shooting loose" by any means.

One person that did listen to Keith was Carl Hellstrom, president of S&W in the 1950’s. He showed interest in Elmer’s pet load and discussed the prospect of a new forty-four sixgun with him. Who would supply the ammunition? Only with the dawn of silhouetting and the explosion of handgun hunting would we see firearms being produced without factory ammunition available. Hellstrom went to Remington and they agreed to supply the ammo if Smith & Wesson would supply the sixgun. Remington produced the first lot of ammunition in 1954. The new ammunition was one-eighth inch longer than the .44 Special, and this was done so it would not chamber in .44 Special sixguns. This had to be done since this was not Elmer’s .44 Special load but truly a full-house big bore Magnum load. Please note carefully: Keith did not invent the .44 Magnum as others have stated. He simply lead the way with his .44 Special load and the ink he gave it for so many years.

Smith rechambered four 1950 Target .44 Specials for the new round in 1954. These were standard .44 Specials except for the rechambering and specially heat treated cylinders. Remington received one of the "new" revolvers for testing and it was soon obvious that the thirty-nine ounce weight of the .44 Target Model was definitely too light for the recoil of the new .44 Special Magnum. Keith had asked for 1200 feet per second and the new round was claimed to achieve 1500 feet per second plus!

To provide the desirable increase in weight, S&W introduced a sixgun with a barrel that was .15" greater in diameter and a cylinder that was .18" longer. This brought the weight of the six and one-half inch barreled original .44 Magnum up to three pounds. Strangely enough, thirty-five years later, a "new" .44 Magnum Mountain Pistol would be offered with a .44 Special barrel!

By early 1955, tests were completed and Smith & Wesson began tooling up to produce what at the time was known simply as the .44 Magnum. The first factory revolver was completed on December 29, 1955 and shipped to Remington. In January, the next two were completed and one went to the NRA for testing by Major Hatcher and the other was shipped to Elmer Keith in Salmon, Idaho. By the end of 1956 more than 3000 Smith & Wesson .44 Magnums had been produced in the original six and one-half inch length as well as the easy packin’ four-inch length. The eight and three-eighths inch length would follow in 1958.

As a kid fresh out of high school, I fired one of the first four- inch .44 sixguns that a local dealer rented out at six shots for fifty cents. It was a real attention getter at his range and it certainly got my attention. I fired it and said the recoil wasn’t bad. I lied!

Reporting in the AMERICAN RIFLEMAN for March of 1956, Major Hatcher said: "In shooting the .44 Magnum, we found it advisable to use gloves, as the recoil can only be described as severe. Without gloves, the checkering hurts the hand, and the sharp edges of the cylinder latch are almost certain to shave off bits of skin. After firing many heavy handloads in the .44 Special, we expected a heavy recoil with this ultra-powerful new cartridge. At the first shot the gun rose up a bit, and the first reaction was that it was not as bad as we had expected. Just about that time, however, we suddenly experienced a sharp stinging sensation over the entire hand, as though we were hitting a fast baseball with a cracked bat. I fired quite a few shots with this gun, but I must honestly confess it is not an unmixed pleasure."

Keith writing in the GUN DIGEST looked upon the .44 Magnum quite differently than Major Hatcher. After all it was his baby. "The big gun is, I would say, pleasant to shoot, and does not jar the hand as much as do my heavy .44 Special loads from the much lighter four-inch barreled .44 Special S&W guns. It is definitely not a ladies gun but I have known women who would enjoy shooting it. The recoil has not bothered me in the slightest, nor have several old sixgun men complained who have fired it extensively, including Hank Benson and Don Martin. The recoil is not as severe as that of a two-inch Airweight Chief’s Special with high speed .38 Specials. With .44 Special factory loads it is just as pleasant to shoot as a K-22 and with the .44 Magnum loads, which give the highest recoil, it will not bother a seasoned sixgun man at all. Recoil with my heaviest loads of 22 grains of 2400 and the Keith 250 grain bullet is much less than that of the factory load. The factory load, fired with one hand, flips the barrel up almost to the vertical."

I’m afraid Keith’s assessment sold many .44 Magnum sixguns which then wound up back on the dealer’s shelves as slightly used guns since the shooter found that their reaction upon shooting the .44 was much closer to Major Hatcher’s.

By 1957, Ruger’s offering in .44 Magnum was starting to show up on gun dealer’s shelves. At first they had rechambered their .357 Blackhawk, which was smaller than today’s .357 New Model Blackhawk, to .44 Magnum. Three of these were shown at the NRA Convention, with barrel lengths of four and five-eighths inches, five and one-half inches, and seven and one-half inches. Elmer relates: "They were very nice looking sixguns, but the cylinder was too short to accept my .44 Magnum handload, and I told him (Bill Ruger) then the frame was too small and the cylinder also too small in diameter for the heavy load. Bill asked me if I wanted one and I told him I would like the four and five-eighths inch and would use it with .44 Special loads. He told me to pick it up before leaving for Idaho, but when I went to get it the boys had packed it for shipment back to the Ruger factory; so Bill said he would send it to me. However, before shipping, he decided to proof fire it, during which time the gun blew up. Bill then wrote that I was right and he was redesigning the whole gun to handle the big load. The frame would be made larger and also the cylinder, and it would be longer to handle perfectly my 250 grain .44 Magnum handload. He sent me one in the so- called Black Hawk design in four and five-eighths inch barrel. It proved to be very fine single action but I was still not satisfied."

Keith than goes on to relate the improvements he asked for which resulted in the Super Blackhawk two years later. For myself, I much prefer the original .44 Blackhawk, now lovingly known as the Flat-Top, to the `improved’ Super Blackhawk. The original was much lighter and had the Colt Single Action-style grip frame that I still prefer over the Dragoon style Super Blackhawk grip frame that Colt dropped in 1851!

The first prototype Ruger .44 Magnums on the .357 frame were in the standard Colt Single Action barrel lengths but for some strange reason when the .44 Blackhawk became a reality the barrel length was six and one-half inches. I much prefer the balance of seven and one-half inch length .44 Blackhawk and had my first year six and one-half inch Blackhawk first cut to four and five-eighths inches and then later rebarreled to seven and one-half inches with an early Super Blackhawk barrel.

For some reason the original Blackhawk was never offered with the shorter easier packin’ four and five-eighths inch length that was made up for Keith or the five and one-half inch length. Of the nearly 30,000 .44 Magnum Blackhawks produced, around 1,000 each were made in seven and one-half inch and ten-inch lengths and all the rest were six and one- half inchers.

In 1959, the Super Blackhawk was introduced and the standard .44 Blackhawk was finally dropped in 1963 when Ruger went to the Three-Screw or Old Model frame and grip frame. The Three Screw Ruger Super Blackhawks were offered only in seven and one-half inches in length except for a very few that were one inch shorter. With the coming of the New Model Super Blackhawk, ten and one-half inch models were offered for silhouetting and hunting and just recently Super Blackhawks have been available with shorter barrels and standard Blackhawk grip frames.

By 1958, .44 Magnums were available from not only Ruger and Smith & Wesson, but Great Western as well. The Great Western did not last long as the Great Western factory folded and the only .44 Magnums available in the 1960’s were the Smith & Wesson .44 Magnum and the Ruger Super Blackhawk.

Enter Detective Harry Callahan. Clint Eastwood’s unrealistic portrayal of a San Francisco cop who carried a .44 "Go ahead, Make my day!" Magnum created such a demand that Smith & Wessons soon doubled in price. In a way this false demand turned out to be a good thing as other manufacturers tried to get in on the .44 Magnum craze and we have since seen forty-fours from Freedom Arms, Texas Longhorn Arms, Dan Wesson, InterArms, Mossberg, U.S. Arms, High Standard, Iver Johnson, Arminius, Llama, Astra, R.G., F.I.E., and Sauer.

Two prototypes that never saw production are very interesting. The first is a .44 Magnum TripleLock from Rossi of Brazil. This was a very good looking four-inch .44 Magnum with a vent rib barrel and a cylinder that locked fore, aft, and also at the front of the cylinder. This sixgun also had smooth wood stocks that looked much like the Skeeter Skelton style now offered by BluMagnum. Whoever designed this .44 understood sixguns. Where is it now?

The second protype was a beefed up Colt Single Action in.44 Magnum that never saw production. It looked much like the later Abilenes, El Dorados, and Sevilles. Finally after thirty-five plus years Colt offered a .44 Magnum in the excellent Anaconda.

The .44 Magnum is no longer the World’s Most Powerful revolver. It has been overtaken by both the .454 Casull and the .445 SuperMag as well as the wildcat .475 and .500 Linebaughs. But for most shooters, the .44 is plenty gun, and perhaps even more than they bargained for. The forty- four has been around for nearly forty-five years and I can’t see anything in the future except more popularity for this excellent cartridge and the fine sixguns made for it. As we are in the closing days of the twentieth century, I think it will be safe to say that the .44 Magnum will be regarded by most sixgunners as the premier cartridge development of the last 100 years. It has been king for nearly fifty years to which we simply say: "Long Live The King!"

Notable Replies

  1. For a time I owned a Ruger Redhawk with 5-1/2" barrel. Well made, accurate, but a load to carry.

    I did some thinking and, after trading the Redhawk, I came up with this. A T/C Super 14 chopped and crowned by SSK to 7-1/2" that fits in a 6" revolver holster. Much lighter. A bit more accurate, and good enough for what I needed a .44 Mag to do.

    Sorry it is a one gun instead of a six gun. But one good shot is often enough.

  2. That’s the idea!

    But that looks like a load to carry itself :smile:

  3. I have a 44mag Blackhawk. I am a single action revolver junky. :joy: So that weapon is still a single action. I used to own one an Encore ) had a rifle barrel for it also . But I will tell ya why I got rid of it. There was No and I mean No scope or reddot that would hold up to the recoil not to mention the wood grips just beat the hands clear off you after 10 rounds.
    I also had several instances of not being able to get that second shot off and game was lost to me. I am a very ethical hunter and I will track and track and track to make sure I truly missed. If I did miss with a revolver a second shot could and has taken the prize for me several times. To put some context to what I am saying is I was walking and had a Deer walk around a point below me I had been having a horrible miserable cold day. I pulled up free handed cut down on the deer and for some weird reason. Just as I pulled the trigger the Doe wheeled her head around to lick her back and the bullet struck her in the jaw. ( Later on I was mystified that it actually stopped the remainder of bullet travel) However I was able to quickly cock the hammer and take care of the animal after this super weird instance. I have missed etc… when I had the TCEncore and second shot quickness is a far stretch unless you have the extra round in your hand.

  4. It’s actually not bad. Mostly wood. The barrel is a chopped 14" (making it semi-bull) and it fits in a 6" revolver holster. I have an original 10" octagonal .44 Mag barrel to fit the Contender and it is FIERCE to shoot. I see why few were made. The muzzle flats are dime thick. Survivable with midrange 44 Spl loads.

  5. That John Taffin article got me wee mind thinking I need to get out and shoot so gonna try tomorrow .

Continue the discussion at

8 more replies


Avatar for John-Taffin Avatar for Jsquints Avatar for Stumpkiller Avatar for Robert Avatar for WV460HUNTER

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top